Conquerors
I recently had a debate with some of my friends about conquerors trough history. We ended up with four 'finalists' and divided them in two groups.
Genghis khan vs. Alexander the great
and Napoleon vs. Hitler.
We divided them because wars were fought in different ways. The same goes for ruling (governing) a country. Although, in that case, Hitler and Bonaparte cannot be compared, it's still the closest we could find. So what do you think?
My first vote went to Genghis khan. He conquerd bigger territory, and created an empire that lasted even after his death. He also had to unite the Mongols first while Alexander was born as a king. Just some of my arguments.
As for Napoleon and Hitler. I'm still undecided.
Genghis khan vs. Alexander the great
and Napoleon vs. Hitler.
We divided them because wars were fought in different ways. The same goes for ruling (governing) a country. Although, in that case, Hitler and Bonaparte cannot be compared, it's still the closest we could find. So what do you think?
My first vote went to Genghis khan. He conquerd bigger territory, and created an empire that lasted even after his death. He also had to unite the Mongols first while Alexander was born as a king. Just some of my arguments.
As for Napoleon and Hitler. I'm still undecided.
I may be part french, and prefer the French, but I say hitler. Also Would they have the same weaponry or the ones of their times, if So hitler would beat all of them. Also would the 2 winners face it out after.
