The Dink Network

Thinking causes nothing but trouble. Immersed in abstractions of an apparantly inherintly absurd existance, truth. Recursive thoughts ponder the unponderable, defining arbitrarily contrived definitions until the impassible, unreducable brick wall of truth is encountered. Ridiculous! Invokes a comedic reaction. Humour, the reward payload upon the discovery of a juxtaposition in order to better interpret the disorganised and impose false order to cope and survive. How could these aimless pensive ganders into meaningless apparant meanings conclude with anything but laughter? Laughing at my inability to attain real knowledge, satisfaction or impurterbation.

Welcome back, Spacehoggy! Glad to see your insaniouness back here in TDN.

Arrgh! Too many wurds!1!11

Now, whos this fella Spacehoggy then?

nice to meet you. that's too many big words, and i'm the most avid reader you can meet thus far.

Well, let us see here: Are you familiar with the Socratic method?

tl;dr

Welcome.

I know of the socratic method, not a lot, although I (probably ignorantly) believe my 'argument' couldn't be challenged with it. I'm simply pointing out the absurdity of truth. How, for example a binary bit, lets say 1 cannot be broken down into it's constituent parts as the reductionist scientist in me strives to do. I suppose I am talking about a theoretical 1 as any 'real' or concieved 1 is there for a number of quantifiable reasons, more facts which are true because of 'xyz' which perhaps invalidates my argument as I am talking about what does exist, not what theoretically can exist. And, of course perhaps I'm just talking out my ass and I don't even realise it. Although... Right now I believe reductionism only works up to a point and that is absurd.

Or y'know... god did it .

But aye, question away.

There's smaller things than that '1', but from there it involves diving into hardware to mess with switches. Anyway, everything has a beginning and an end, the same goes for reducing or expanding ideas or values.

In the realm of computers, there's on (1) and off (0), am I right? So it either exists or doesn't exist, you might say. unfortunately, life at large doesn't seem to be so simple, though truth may be composed of that which does and that which doesn't exist.