Reply to Re: Are there any Objectivists out here? (nope...looks like only me and DD)
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
ok aside from all this nonsense that no one to bother to read ill share with you some true insight.
A if you believe that metaphycisal exists (meaning anything not purely pysical, like an atom, a tree, a rock) you cannot prove that the physical exists outside of your metaphyical persception. therefore you can believe in god, souls, however with the notion that anything pysical is your perception and cannot be logically proven to exists independentally.
B you belive that physical exists, meaning ONLY purely physical. you can believe in atom placements and chemical states which the concepts of we know to be trees, rocks, emotions, etc. likewise you cannot logically prove anything metaphysical to exist apart from your physical reality.
so in other words dualism is illogical. you can either believe in A or B but YOU CANNOT LOGICALLY JUSTIFY BOTH without a degree of personal "believe" or "fiath" which may be hed outside of philophy unless you want to look like a one-sided idiot with no sense of logic.]
therefore you can either believe A that people hold the capacity for good and evil, that people have souls and life has meaning, or you can believe that B life does not exist apart from an arrangement of atoms and that hacking a human bean to pieces is no different that hacking a chair to pieces apart from the chemical arrangement in ones brain to make them feel outraged. there is no
"sin" or "wrongdoing" involved whatsoever. this is the bleak path you choose to take as objectiveist merely because you are an eliteist shoothead who cant admit that there are things in the world which YOU CANNOT CONTROL and that YOU CANNOT CATEGORIZE INTO A SIMPLE CHART or Graph. its all an ego problem, not want to admit that you cant hold everything to a standard of understanding. what it comes down to is you thinking you are cooler than you really are.
“It is man's natural sickness to believe that he possesses the Truth.”
--Blaise Pascal
A if you believe that metaphycisal exists (meaning anything not purely pysical, like an atom, a tree, a rock) you cannot prove that the physical exists outside of your metaphyical persception. therefore you can believe in god, souls, however with the notion that anything pysical is your perception and cannot be logically proven to exists independentally.
B you belive that physical exists, meaning ONLY purely physical. you can believe in atom placements and chemical states which the concepts of we know to be trees, rocks, emotions, etc. likewise you cannot logically prove anything metaphysical to exist apart from your physical reality.
so in other words dualism is illogical. you can either believe in A or B but YOU CANNOT LOGICALLY JUSTIFY BOTH without a degree of personal "believe" or "fiath" which may be hed outside of philophy unless you want to look like a one-sided idiot with no sense of logic.]
therefore you can either believe A that people hold the capacity for good and evil, that people have souls and life has meaning, or you can believe that B life does not exist apart from an arrangement of atoms and that hacking a human bean to pieces is no different that hacking a chair to pieces apart from the chemical arrangement in ones brain to make them feel outraged. there is no
"sin" or "wrongdoing" involved whatsoever. this is the bleak path you choose to take as objectiveist merely because you are an eliteist shoothead who cant admit that there are things in the world which YOU CANNOT CONTROL and that YOU CANNOT CATEGORIZE INTO A SIMPLE CHART or Graph. its all an ego problem, not want to admit that you cant hold everything to a standard of understanding. what it comes down to is you thinking you are cooler than you really are.
“It is man's natural sickness to believe that he possesses the Truth.”
--Blaise Pascal
