Reply to Re: Are there any Objectivists out here?
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Not listening?...wrong. I am listening, but I do not buy it, that is all. the assumption that i am not listening even though I refute his claims is poor to say the least.
I have been through many beleif systems before coming to this one, and I have rejected them all (eventually) as invalid.
Until your offer me factual evidence I will not change my philosophies.
As for the proof you wanted...i will give you some more when I return abit later. For starters though, how can something not have precise properties like Heisen claims? Thats a contradiction, contradictions cannot exist in reality in part or in whole.
How can an electron be a 'probablity field'? it has an effect on physical objects, so it must also be a physical objects. Physical objects cannot be probablitity fields, that is another contradiction...
I have been through many beleif systems before coming to this one, and I have rejected them all (eventually) as invalid.
Until your offer me factual evidence I will not change my philosophies.
As for the proof you wanted...i will give you some more when I return abit later. For starters though, how can something not have precise properties like Heisen claims? Thats a contradiction, contradictions cannot exist in reality in part or in whole.
How can an electron be a 'probablity field'? it has an effect on physical objects, so it must also be a physical objects. Physical objects cannot be probablitity fields, that is another contradiction...
