Reply to Re: I will be off for a while.
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
an Australian who displays(displayed) Mexico flag on his profile just for the racist taunts
So Godley, if you wish to have a joust of intelligence with me, I will play along; prepare to lose though.
Godley, you apparently don't have the knowledge or the memory to comprehend the pun that the Mexican flag represented. As a result of this ignorance, you made the unfounded claim that I displayed the Mexican flag "for the racist taunts".
This claim is wrong of course, since you have endeavoured to read my mind and my intentions based on nothing more then the fact that you don't like me because I have called you an arsehole on several occasions for blatantly bullying and insulting other forum members.
I will begin by pointing out your accusing me of displaying the Mexican flag was so I would receive racist taunts to be false. Your claim can only be valid if two presumptions are met: 1.) That I am a masochist, wilfully seek embarrassment and oppression 2.) That I think that a significant number of people frequenting this board hate or are racially discriminative towards Mexican people.
Neither presumptions are true - if anything, they are outright false on account of three facts: 1.) I am not a masochist 2.) I do not desire the majority of people on The Dink Network to hate me 3.) I do not, at the time of writing, think that any people on The Dink Network hate or are racist towards Mexicans.
The real reason I displayed the Mexican flag has been previously explained in this thread.
So how you described me is completely bullshoot.
Now let's examine the context in which you used the above mentioned lie:
Everyone would, except <schnapper>
Your idea was that when you copied my post but replaced the target as me instead of yourself, that you were very funny. When YeOldeToast made his statement as per above, you decided to claim that everyone on The Dink Network would be amused and supportive of your smart-arsery. You are partially right in that I don't think you're funny.
Your statement that my declaration about your post suggesting that KrisKnox enjoys homosexual porn was "inflammatory, derogative and aggressive without incitation" is wrong. You suggested two things: 1.) That you hate homosexuals and think that they are inferior 2.) That Krisknox is homosexual (as an insult). This is why your' post was inflammatory, derogative and aggressive without incitation and my condemnation of your behaviour was not inflammatory, derogative or aggressive without incitation, on account of the fact that you were bullying an upstanding member of the community.
So Godley, if you wish to have a joust of intelligence with me, I will play along; prepare to lose though.
Godley, you apparently don't have the knowledge or the memory to comprehend the pun that the Mexican flag represented. As a result of this ignorance, you made the unfounded claim that I displayed the Mexican flag "for the racist taunts".
This claim is wrong of course, since you have endeavoured to read my mind and my intentions based on nothing more then the fact that you don't like me because I have called you an arsehole on several occasions for blatantly bullying and insulting other forum members.
I will begin by pointing out your accusing me of displaying the Mexican flag was so I would receive racist taunts to be false. Your claim can only be valid if two presumptions are met: 1.) That I am a masochist, wilfully seek embarrassment and oppression 2.) That I think that a significant number of people frequenting this board hate or are racially discriminative towards Mexican people.
Neither presumptions are true - if anything, they are outright false on account of three facts: 1.) I am not a masochist 2.) I do not desire the majority of people on The Dink Network to hate me 3.) I do not, at the time of writing, think that any people on The Dink Network hate or are racist towards Mexicans.
The real reason I displayed the Mexican flag has been previously explained in this thread.
So how you described me is completely bullshoot.
Now let's examine the context in which you used the above mentioned lie:
Everyone would, except <schnapper>
Your idea was that when you copied my post but replaced the target as me instead of yourself, that you were very funny. When YeOldeToast made his statement as per above, you decided to claim that everyone on The Dink Network would be amused and supportive of your smart-arsery. You are partially right in that I don't think you're funny.
Your statement that my declaration about your post suggesting that KrisKnox enjoys homosexual porn was "inflammatory, derogative and aggressive without incitation" is wrong. You suggested two things: 1.) That you hate homosexuals and think that they are inferior 2.) That Krisknox is homosexual (as an insult). This is why your' post was inflammatory, derogative and aggressive without incitation and my condemnation of your behaviour was not inflammatory, derogative or aggressive without incitation, on account of the fact that you were bullying an upstanding member of the community.
