Reply to Re: return;
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Yeah, and it works with external() too!
Oh, hey, feature request for any maybe future versions of Dink:
Please accept things like "int &var = eight();". It seems like something you'd want to work... In the perfect world, there should be no difference in the usage of self-defined functions and built-in functions.
And while at it, fix "make_global_function", even though I currently don't really know how broken it is.
Enh, I should look into getting the source compiled myself, so I can add these things <_<
Oh, hey, feature request for any maybe future versions of Dink:
Please accept things like "int &var = eight();". It seems like something you'd want to work... In the perfect world, there should be no difference in the usage of self-defined functions and built-in functions.
And while at it, fix "make_global_function", even though I currently don't really know how broken it is.
Enh, I should look into getting the source compiled myself, so I can add these things <_<
