Reply to Re: Avatar is just another movie trying to top the betters of it
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
There are soooo many poorly thought out statements in that post, Skull. I'm not going to go through each individually, 'cos... well, this is getting silly now.
"If it has no interesting story it can't be well directed. I don't know any of the cast that played in the movie".
The first point is wrong. A film can be well directed without having a good story.
As for the second point... what has that got to do with anything? Just because you haven't heard of people it doesn't mean they aren't excellent actors. Also, Sigourney Weaver is in it. Surely you've heard of her?
I don't know why I'm bothering to continue discussing this. Then again, I do slow down for car crashes.
EDIT: Just to make this clear, I'm not trying to insult you, Skull. But your arguments are quite bizarre
"If it has no interesting story it can't be well directed. I don't know any of the cast that played in the movie".
The first point is wrong. A film can be well directed without having a good story.
As for the second point... what has that got to do with anything? Just because you haven't heard of people it doesn't mean they aren't excellent actors. Also, Sigourney Weaver is in it. Surely you've heard of her?
I don't know why I'm bothering to continue discussing this. Then again, I do slow down for car crashes.
EDIT: Just to make this clear, I'm not trying to insult you, Skull. But your arguments are quite bizarre
