Reply to Re: Should America go to war?
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
"Ok. Think of all countries as they were persons.. America would obviously be a big muscular man, who thinks more with his di.. than brains."
Already you've screwed it up. Thinks more with d*ck than brains? I'd like to know what you think with. Really, we've made some mistakes with foreign policies, but what would YOU do in our position?
"The situation with Iraq is freezed. -If it attacks in America, it'll do it virtually alone.. Now imagine that Iraq has an atom bomb. It doesn't have any use of attacking America with it unless as a last resort, which even then, would only be it's last strike before dieing. (America -> Iraq -> KABOOM)"
That's why they haven't nuked the US. They still want to go on as they are. Or rather Saddam does. But that's just stating the obvious, that anybody could see.
"So basically, America has an advantage"
OH! My god you're brilliant.
"It can delay the war for years if it wants.. But propably, sooner or later, the war WILL begin."
We've figured this out too. That why we DON'T want to delay the war, the UN does.
"What America is being real stupid in here is -- it just doesn't know whether Iraq has chemicals or atom bombs or anything... America should find out more of Iraq before attacking. I don't like delaying things like this... But I say, know your enemy!"
Uh, that's part of the reason why we're going to war. Again, if we knew our enemy well, we'd already be at war or not even having a thought about war right now.
"Besides - Iraq would need dozens of atom bombs and hundreds of thousands of men to survive if America attacks it.. Even though it could win America, other countries would invade it and finally, destroy it. The only advantage in this Bush's oppression is that Iraq will be destroyed sooner.. But 90% surely with more losses than if it would attack in a better time. Thank you. This is my last statement."
You've gotten more logical. I'm glad. But how could Iraq possibly win against America? I can't see any way. And America should attack at a better time? So basically you're saying wait. Wait for them to make more weapons, and have more time to build up an army. Waiting won't answer any questions to a constantly developing problem.
This post is an improvement over your previous ones in this thread. Congrats.
P.S. just yesterday my teacher gave me the coolest toilet paper ever. It's yellow, and has a picture of Saddam's gleaming smile on each square. Below the picture, it advertises: "Put a stain on Hussein." I stained that sh*thead good. Rawk on! \m/
Edit: Eh...sorry if I was a jackass in this post...I apologize. I just had a night and morning. Didn't mean to take it out on you.
Already you've screwed it up. Thinks more with d*ck than brains? I'd like to know what you think with. Really, we've made some mistakes with foreign policies, but what would YOU do in our position?
"The situation with Iraq is freezed. -If it attacks in America, it'll do it virtually alone.. Now imagine that Iraq has an atom bomb. It doesn't have any use of attacking America with it unless as a last resort, which even then, would only be it's last strike before dieing. (America -> Iraq -> KABOOM)"
That's why they haven't nuked the US. They still want to go on as they are. Or rather Saddam does. But that's just stating the obvious, that anybody could see.
"So basically, America has an advantage"
OH! My god you're brilliant.
"It can delay the war for years if it wants.. But propably, sooner or later, the war WILL begin."
We've figured this out too. That why we DON'T want to delay the war, the UN does.
"What America is being real stupid in here is -- it just doesn't know whether Iraq has chemicals or atom bombs or anything... America should find out more of Iraq before attacking. I don't like delaying things like this... But I say, know your enemy!"
Uh, that's part of the reason why we're going to war. Again, if we knew our enemy well, we'd already be at war or not even having a thought about war right now.
"Besides - Iraq would need dozens of atom bombs and hundreds of thousands of men to survive if America attacks it.. Even though it could win America, other countries would invade it and finally, destroy it. The only advantage in this Bush's oppression is that Iraq will be destroyed sooner.. But 90% surely with more losses than if it would attack in a better time. Thank you. This is my last statement."
You've gotten more logical. I'm glad. But how could Iraq possibly win against America? I can't see any way. And America should attack at a better time? So basically you're saying wait. Wait for them to make more weapons, and have more time to build up an army. Waiting won't answer any questions to a constantly developing problem.
This post is an improvement over your previous ones in this thread. Congrats.
P.S. just yesterday my teacher gave me the coolest toilet paper ever. It's yellow, and has a picture of Saddam's gleaming smile on each square. Below the picture, it advertises: "Put a stain on Hussein." I stained that sh*thead good. Rawk on! \m/
Edit: Eh...sorry if I was a jackass in this post...I apologize. I just had a night and morning. Didn't mean to take it out on you.
