: : If the community gets smaller now, it DIES! You who until now just play D-Mods can save it, or at least extend its life!
: I'm confused! If you DO delete the members who do not release any files for the Dink community, then they would leave Dink community and that means the community will get smaller and then eventually die! Most of all game communities are simply players. You just can't ask every gamer to be a game developer.
Huzzah. (not sure what that means, but I think it fits)
99% of people are sheep. "Bah" they say, "Bah bah bah baaaah ba baaaa baah" or "Give us some grass already." People regularly watch TV shows, play video games, watch dvds, play computer games, listen to music, watch movies, and more. A small percentage of people actually create.
Think of it in bigger terms... look at imdb.com. They have millions of members. But, what if they only allowed people to be members if they took part in a movie? Be it actor, director, producer, or fake shemp, you'd have to be in a movie to be a member. I don't know anything about making movies or acting. I'm betting most of you (outside Dukie) don't either. So would it make any sense at all for only a select few to have membership at imdb.com? No.
: : : If the community gets smaller now, it DIES! You who until now just play D-Mods can save it, or at least extend its life!
: : I'm confused! If you DO delete the members who do not release any files for the Dink community, then they would leave Dink community and that means the community will get smaller and then eventually die! Most of all game communities are simply players. You just can't ask every gamer to be a game developer.
: Huzzah. (not sure what that means, but I think it fits)
: 99% of people are sheep. "Bah" they say, "Bah bah bah baaaah ba baaaa baah" or "Give us some grass already." People regularly watch TV shows, play video games, watch dvds, play computer games, listen to music, watch movies, and more. A small percentage of people actually create.
: Think of it in bigger terms... look at imdb.com. They have millions of members. But, what if they only allowed people to be members if they took part in a movie? Be it actor, director, producer, or fake shemp, you'd have to be in a movie to be a member. I don't know anything about making movies or acting. I'm betting most of you (outside Dukie) don't either. So would it make any sense at all for only a select few to have membership at imdb.com? No.
hey! i am a movie creator too!
Shhyeshh, great example in there Redink. :)
Maybe we could develop Ehal's idea. Give people a year of warning time or something, like: "If you haven't done a Dink Smallwood file within a year from today, YOU WILL BE ERASED!BUAHAHAHAHUAHAHAAHUHUHAHAHAAHAHAA!!!", maybe 10-20 people would actually learn DinkC because of that, and create a dmod. Then, of course, it could happen that it would anger people, and they would leave right away.. And in other hand, many people could do a dmod where is a few ugly screens, and a bonca copied from Dink original.. Oh well.. Then we could make a goodness-scale for dmod, some sort of a line that dmods under that wouldn't be released.. And then we could develop that idea too. Doesn't this sound great? ;)
: Shhyeshh, great example in there Redink. :)
: Maybe we could develop Ehal's idea. Give people a year of warning time or something, like: "If you haven't done a Dink Smallwood file within a year from today, YOU WILL BE ERASED!BUAHAHAHAHUAHAHAAHUHUHAHAHAAHAHAA!!!", maybe 10-20 people would actually learn DinkC because of that, and create a dmod. Then, of course, it could happen that it would anger people, and they would leave right away.. And in other hand, many people could do a dmod where is a few ugly screens, and a bonca copied from Dink original.. Oh well.. Then we could make a goodness-scale for dmod, some sort of a line that dmods under that wouldn't be released.. And then we could develop that idea too. Doesn't this sound great? ;)
Excellent. ;)
May I suggest you and ehasl are named the THINKERS among dinkers from now on? ;)
: : Shhyeshh, great example in there Redink. :)
: : Maybe we could develop Ehal's idea. Give people a year of warning time or something, like: "If you haven't done a Dink Smallwood file within a year from today, YOU WILL BE ERASED!BUAHAHAHAHUAHAHAAHUHUHAHAHAAHAHAA!!!", maybe 10-20 people would actually learn DinkC because of that, and create a dmod. Then, of course, it could happen that it would anger people, and they would leave right away.. And in other hand, many people could do a dmod where is a few ugly screens, and a bonca copied from Dink original.. Oh well.. Then we could make a goodness-scale for dmod, some sort of a line that dmods under that wouldn't be released.. And then we could develop that idea too. Doesn't this sound great? ;)
: Excellent. ;)
: May I suggest you and ehasl are named the THINKERS among dinkers from now on? ;)
I suggest calling you a dinkeresse... ;)
: Shhyeshh, great example in there Redink. :)
: Maybe we could develop Ehal's idea. Give people a year of warning time or something, like: "If you haven't done a Dink Smallwood file within a year from today, YOU WILL BE ERASED!BUAHAHAHAHUAHAHAAHUHUHAHAHAAHAHAA!!!", maybe 10-20 people would actually learn DinkC because of that, and create a dmod. Then, of course, it could happen that it would anger people, and they would leave right away.. And in other hand, many people could do a dmod where is a few ugly screens, and a bonca copied from Dink original.. Oh well.. Then we could make a goodness-scale for dmod, some sort of a line that dmods under that wouldn't be released.. And then we could develop that idea too. Doesn't this sound great? ;)
No
Though... perhaps good ol' ehasl was being sarcastic. He was winkin' away in the subject. And everyone acts like its a crime against humanity.
: Though... perhaps good ol' ehasl was being sarcastic. He was winkin' away in the subject. And everyone acts like its a crime against humanity.
redink1 is right. i didn't actually mean that all the sheep (;))should be erased. what i meant was that the community needs more people who helps the fellowship. and, as mimifish said, there is no point in deleting members, because you do not need to to sign in for accessing the downloading area. :)
: : Though... perhaps good ol' ehasl was being sarcastic. He was winkin' away in the subject. And everyone acts like its a crime against humanity.
: redink1 is right. i didn't actually mean that all the sheep (;))should be erased. what i meant was that the community needs more people who helps the fellowship. and, as mimifish said, there is no point in deleting members, because you do not need to to sign in for accessing the downloading area. :)
why dont we just form a reich to beat the world in to complete submission, and us in our perfection will force dinkc upon hummanity, and hail dink like some kind of savior to the human race?
: : : Though... perhaps good ol' ehasl was being sarcastic. He was winkin' away in the subject. And everyone acts like its a crime against humanity.
: : redink1 is right. i didn't actually mean that all the sheep (;))should be erased. what i meant was that the community needs more people who helps the fellowship. and, as mimifish said, there is no point in deleting members, because you do not need to to sign in for accessing the downloading area. :)
: why dont we just form a reich to beat the world in to complete submission, and us in our perfection will force dinkc upon hummanity, and hail dink like some kind of savior to the human race?
But aren't we doing this already?